Controversies in Political Ideologies: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Speeches of Indian and Pakistani Premiers on Pulwama Incident

Muhammad Imran Shah, Saeed Ahmad Ahmad, Ali Danishs

Abstract


Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is considered an effective approach to explore the hidden realities in a text. The current research analyzes the speeches of the leaders of the two states on the incident of Pulwama attack on 14th February 2019 in the region of Indian occupied Kashmir to control the minds of the audience and formulate their ideologies to achieve their political benefits through power abuse. The data has been taken from the speeches delivered by the both political leaders, the Premier of Pakistan Imran Khan and the Premier of India, Narendra Modi on Pulwama Attack. Both qualitative and quantitative research approaches have been followed to investigate the texts. For Quantitative data,  AntConc 3.5.8 has been utilized for the frequencies and concordance of the important words to be discussed. Observation has been utilized to gain in-depth information to describe qualitatively. The results show that some specific linguistic choices regarding some specific vocabulary, pronouns, and modal verbs have been used ideologically by the premiers to manipulate the language of their speeches. The study will be important for researchers who want to investigate the discourse developed by the political leaders’ speeches on same issue .    

Keywords: Discourse, pronoun, modality corpus, intertextuality


References


Alhumaidi, M. (2013). A critical discourse analysis of Al-Ahram and Aljazeera’s online coverage of Egypt’s revolution (Doctoral dissertation). University of Florida.

Allen, W. (2007). Australian political discourse: Pronominal choice in campaign speeches. In M. L. Mushin. (Ed.), Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. (pp. 1-13).

Anthony, L. (2019). AntConc (Version 3.5.8) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software

Audin, A. G. (2019). A Discourse Analysis on Economic Plenary Debates over the General Appropriations Bill in the Philippines. Asian EFL Journal Research Articles, 23(3.4).

Bayram, F. (2010). IDEOLOGY AND POLITICAL DISCOURSE: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF ERDOGAN'S POLITICAL SPEECH. Annual Review of Education, Communication & Language Sciences, 7.

Bazargani, D. T. (2015). A comparative study on two translations of the Holy Qur'an: A critical discourse analysis approach. Translation studies, 13(49), 49-64.

Blommaert, J., & Bulaen, C. (2000). Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29, 447-66.

Bramley, N. R. (2001). Pronouns of politics: the use of pronouns in the construction of ‘self’ and ‘other’ in political interviews.

Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

Devereux, E. (1998). Devils and angels: Television, ideology and the coverage of poverty. University of Luton Press.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power Longman. In: London.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, England: Polity Press

Fairclough, N. (1995). (1995b) Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (20/12/2006). Tony Blair and the language of politics. Available at: http://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-blair/blair_language_4205.jsp (Accessed: 24 July 2017).

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language: Routledge.

Foucault, M., & Deleuze, G. (1977). Intellectuals and power: Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews, 205, 209.

Fowler, R. (1986). Linguistic Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fowler, Roger. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press (Vol. 20). London: Routledge.

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.

Gee, J. P. (1991). A linguistic approach to narrative. Journal of Narrative and Life History/Narrative Inquiry, 1(1), 15-39.

Ghilzai, S., Ayaz, M., & Asghar. (2017). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Imran Khan's First Speech in the Parliament. 2, 149-167.

Halliday, A. K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London, Melbourne, Auckland: Edward Arnold.

Johnstone, B. (2008). Discourse analysis. (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Khalil, U., Islam, M., Chattha, S. A., & Qazalbash, F. (2017). Persuasion and political discourse: A critical discourse analysis of Imran Khan. s election speech (2013). Pakistan Vision, 18(2), 193-210.

Kress, G. (Ed.). (1976). Halliday: System and Function in Language: Selected Papers. London: Oxford University Press.

Malimas, M.A, Carreon, J.A., & Peña, N.W. (2018). Critical discourse analysis of filipino women politicians’ campaign speeches. The Asian EFL Journal, 20 (12.2), 386-401.

North, H. (2014). The Discourse Analysis of United States Foreign Policy towards Iraq and Egypt (Master’s thesis). Masaryk University.

Post, M. D. (2009). Representations of meaning within textual personas: An analysis of 2008 US presidential campaign speeches (Master’s thesis). University of Birmingham.

Sajjad, F. (2015). A critical discourse analysis of Barack Hussein Obama’s political speeches on the Middle East and the Muslim World. International Journal of Linguistics, 7(1), 1-41.

Shah, M. I. (2018). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Prime Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan's First Public Address. International Journal of English Linguistics.

Shakoury, K. (2018). Critical Discourse Analysis of Iranian Presidents’ Addresses to the United Nations General Assembly (2007-2016). University of Saskatchewan.

van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and society, 4(2), 249-283.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Aims of critical discourse analysis. Japanese discourse, 1(1), 17-28.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Van Dijk, T. (2000). Multidisciplanary CDA: A plea for Diversity. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 95-120). London: Sage.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2003). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352-371). Oxford: Blackwell.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2005). Politics, ideology and discourse. In: Ruth Wodak, (Ed.), Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Volume on Politics and Language, 728-740.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power: Macmillan International Higher Education.

Wiggins, S. (2009). Discourse analysis. In Encyclopedia of Human Relationships. California: Sage Publications (pp. 427-430).

Zhang, X. (2013). The third US-China strategic and economic dialogue: A contrastive study of Chinese and American Newspaper News Reporting. University of Florida,




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v14i1.%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2021 Muhammad Imran Shah,Saeed Ahmad ,Ali Danishs

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

English Education Department, State Institute for Islamic Studies (IAIN) Salatiga, Indonesia 1979-8903 (Print) and 2503-040X : (Online)
In the aim of improving the quality of the Journal since 19th October 2016 this journal officially had made cooperation with ELITE Association Indonesia (The association of Teachers of English Linguistics, Literature & Education). See The MoU Manuscript.

Click for More....

Creative Commons License
REGISTER JOURNAL : http://journalregister.iainsalatiga.ac.id/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License