Email this article 
Proposing a Gaming Language Analysis Procedure to Reveal Video Game Ideology through Ludic Linguistics
Abstract
This study proposes a procedural analysis on the implementation of ludic linguistics to analyze gaming language with wordplays, the core of focus in ludic linguistics, as the point of departure. To formulate the procedural analysis, theories of language play by Crystal ideology of influence and ludonarrative model by Aarseth, wordplay in gaming context by Paul, intended meaning level by Stiles, wordplay transmission by Winter-Froemel, game interface types by Stonehouse and indexical storytelling by Fernández-Vara were applied as the theoretical foundation. To provide a vivid application of the proposed procedural analysis, wordplays appearing on game assets from Konami’s Metal Gear Solid, Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty, and Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater were taken as examples of analysis. The five steps procedure is able to show how wordplays in gaming context are designed as mechanical cues to help gamers complete the games and as narrative cues to help them comprehend the story. Further, this proposed procedure is able to indicate that the mechanical and narrative cues have particular ideology of influence, which affects gamers in reacting and responding to particular problems presented by the games. The result of this study discloses future research on the roles of wordplays in gaming context, signifying the importance of ludic linguistics as a bridge between language studies and game studies.
Keywords: Wordplay; Gaming Language; Ludic Linguistics; Game Dtudies; Metal Gear Solid
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aarseth, E. J. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on ergodic literature. JHU Press.
Aarseth, E. (2012, May). A narrative theory of games. In Proceedings of the international
conference on the foundations of digital Games (pp. 129-133). ACM.
Ahl, F. (1984). The art of safe criticism in Greece and Rome. The American Journal of
Philology, 105(2), 174-208.
Braslavski, P., Blinov, V., Bolotova, V., & Pertsova, K. (2018, March). How to Evaluate
Humorous Response Generation, Seriously?. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval (pp. 225-228). ACM.
Caillois, R. (1961). Man, play and games (M. Barash, Trans.). Champaign: University of
Illinois Press.(Original work published in 1958).
Clearwater, D. (2011). What defines video game genre? Thinking about genre study after the
great divide. Loading..., 5(8).
Crystal, D. (1996). Playing with linguistic problems: From Orwell to Plato and back
again. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics (GURT) 1996: Linguistics, Language Acquisition, and Language Variation: Current Trends and Future Prospects, 5.
Crystal, D. (2001). Language play. University of Chicago Press.
Ensslin, A. (2011). The language of gaming. Macmillan International Higher Education.
Fernández-Vara, C. (2011). Game spaces speak volumes: Indexical storytelling.
Foss, S. K. (2017). Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice. Waveland Press.
Giddings, S. (2009). Events and collusions: A glossary for the microethnography of video
game play. Games and Culture, 4(2), 144-157.
Gillern, S. V. (2016). The Gamer Response and Decision Framework: A Tool for
Understanding Video Gameplay Experiences. Simulation & Gaming, 47(5), 666-683.
Glynn, M. A., & Webster, J. (1992). The adult playfulness scale: An initial
assessment. Psychological reports, 71(1), 83-103.
Huizinga, J. (1949). Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in our culture. Routledge &
Kegan Paul.
Lieberman, J. N. (2014). Playfulness: Its relationship to imagination and creativity.
Academic Press.
Lim, S., & Reeves, B. (2010). Computer agents versus avatars: Responses to interactive game
characters controlled by a computer or other player. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(1-2), 57-68.
Louden, B. (1995). Categories of Homeric wordplay. Transactions of the American
Philological Association (1974-), 125, 27-46.
Mäyrä, F. (2008). An introduction to game studies. Sage.
Mahood, M. M. (2003). Shakespeare's wordplay. Routledge.
McMahan, A. (2003). Immersion, engagement and presence. The video game theory
reader, 67, 86.
Mitsis, P., & Ziogas, I. (Eds.). (2016). Wordplay and Powerplay in Latin Poetry (Vol. 36).
Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Newman, J. (2012). Videogames. Routledge.
Paul, C. A. (2012). Wordplay and the discourse of video games: Analyzing words, design,
and play. Routledge.
Purnomo, S. L. A., Nababan, N., Santosa, R., & Kristina, D. (2016). Game time: Revisiting
ludic linguistics for video game analysis. PROSIDING PRASASTI, 689-694.
Ravaja, N., Salminen, M., Holopainen, J., Saari, T., Laarni, J., & Järvinen, A. (2004,
October). Emotional response patterns and sense of presence during video games: Potential criterion variables for game design. In Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction (pp. 339-347). ACM.
Skalski, P., Tamborini, R., Shelton, A., Buncher, M., & Lindmark, P. (2011). Mapping the
road to fun: Natural video game controllers, presence, and game enjoyment. New Media & Society, 13(2), 224-242.
Stiles, W. B. (1986). Levels of intended meaning of utterances. British Journal of Clinical
Psychology, 25(3), 213-222.
Stonehouse, A. (2014). User interface design in video games. Retrieved August, 3, 2014.
Sudnow, D. (1983). Pilgrim in the Microworld. New York: Warner Books.
Winter-Froemel, E. (2016). Approaching wordplay. Crossing languages to play with words.
Multidisciplinary perspectives, 11-46.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v12i2.235-261
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.