Investigating Lexical Diversity of Children Narratives: A Case Study of L1 Speaking
Abstract
Lexical diversity is one of the language tools to measure varied words or vocabulary produced by learners in a text both spoken and written. This research aims to investigate the lexical diversity of children narratives produced by children orally. The research design of this research was a case study supported by quantitative data. Meanwhile, the subjects of this research are seven children around 6-9 years old. In collecting data, the researchers employed narrative storytelling based on a picture which is drawn by the subjects. In analyzing data, TTR (Type-Token -Ratio) was used to measure the lexical diversity gained from the subject while the theory was used to explain the phenomena. Based on the findings, it is found that (1) older children have higher lexical diversity than the younger ones, (2) younger children produced higher lexical frequency (word tokens) than the older ones (3) individual variations caused an anomaly of the result in which older children were expected to have higher lexical frequency but the result showed the reverse.
Keywords: Lexical Diversity, Children, Oral Narratives, Case Study.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akbari, N. (2017). Lexical diversity and the use of academic and lower frequency words in the academic writing of EFL students. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 40(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.40.1.02akb
Arya, D. J., Hiebert, E. H., & Pearson, P. D. (2011). The effects of syntactic and lexical complexity on the comprehension of elementary science texts. 4(1), 107–125.
Boonkit, K. (2010). Enhancing the development of speaking skills for non-native speakers of English. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.191
Carlisle, J. F., & Fleming, J. (2003). Lexical Processing of Morphologically Complex Words in the Elementary Years. Scientific Studies of Reading. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0703_3
de Bot, K. (2004). The multilingual lexicon: Modelling selection and control. International Journal of Multilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710408668176
Foster, P., & Tavakoli, P. (2009). Native speakers and task performance: Comparing effects on complexity, fluency, and lexical diversity. Language Learning, 59(4), 866–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00528.x
Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). The role of the native language: an historical overview. In Second language acquisition: an introductory course.
González, M. C. (2017). The Contribution of Lexical Diversity to College-Level Writing. TESOL Journal, 8(4), 899–919. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.342
Gregori-Signes, C., & Clavel-Arroitia, B. (2015). Analysing Lexical Density and Lexical Diversity in University Students’ Written Discourse. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.477
Ingram, D. (1989). First Language Acquisition: Method, Description, and Explanation. 1–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099003300205
Johansson, V. (2009). Lexical diversity and lexical density in speech and writing: a developmental perspective. Working Papers in Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.7820/vli.v01.1.koizumi
Juanggo, W. (2018). Investigating lexical diversity and lexical sophistication of productive vocabulary in the written discourse of Indonesian EFL learners. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i1.11462
Kalantari, R., & Gholami, J. (2017). Lexical complexity development from dynamic systems theory perspective: Lexical density, diversity, and sophistication. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1041a
Koizumi, R., & In’nami, Y. (2012). Withdrawal notice to: Effects of text length on lexical diversity measures: Using short texts with less than 200 tokens. System, 40(4), R1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.11.001
Krashen, S., & Terrell, T. (1983). the_Natural_Approach.Pdf. In Stanford Education.
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.307
Lu, X. (2012). The Relationship of Lexical Richness to the Quality of ESL Learners’ Oral Narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 190–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01232.x
Maftoon, P., & Shakouri, N. (2012). Psycholinguistic Approach to Second Language Acquisition. The International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World.
Malvern, D., Richards, B., Chipere, N., & Durán, P. (2004). Lexical Diversity and Language Development. In Lexical Diversity and Language Development. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511804
Saville-Troike, M. (2012). Introducing Second Language Acquisition. In Introducing Second Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511808838.002
Siegel, J. (2010). Second dialect acquisition. In Second Dialect Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511777820
Silverman, S., & Ratner, N. B. (2002). Measuring lexical diversity in children who stutter: Application of vocd. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 27(4), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-730X(02)00162-6
Stokes, S. F., & Fletcher, P. (2000). Lexical diversity and productivity in Cantonese-speaking children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 35(4), 527–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/136828200750001278
Wang, X., & Wang, X. (2014). The relationship between lexical diversity and EFL writing proficiency. Un Iv e r s i t y o f S y d n e y P a p e r s i n T E S OL.
Watkins, R. V., Kelly, D. J., Harbers, H. M., & Hollis, W. (1995). Measuring children’s lexical diversity: Differentiating typical and impaired language learners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38(6), 1349–1355. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3806.1349
Yin, R. K. (2012). Case study methods. In Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874769-11
Yu, G. (2010). Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 236–259. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i2.371-388
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Famala Eka Sanhadi Rahayu, Aries Utomo, Ririn Setyowati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.