Submissions

Online Submissions

Already have a Username/Password for Register Journal?
Go to Login

Need a Username/Password?
Go to Registration

Registration and login are required to submit items online and to check the status of current submissions.

 

Author Guidelines

REGISTER JOURNAL Author Guidelines
 
 General Organization of the Paper ¬ 12pt, Times New Roman bold
 
Double-Blind Peer Review Guidelines
This journal ensures double-blind review for every submitted manuscript. It means that in the review process, this journal conceals both the identity of  reviewer and author  and vice versa.  
To facilitate this, authors need to ensure that their manuscripts are prepared in a way that does not give away their identity in the submitted manuscript.  To help with this preparation please ensure the following when submitting to REGISTER JOURNAL: 
  • Submit the manuscript without the Author biodata (Name, Afiliation, E-mail.). The name of the file must not contain the Author identity.
  • Fill the Author biodata in this  Author Biodata and Please submit it via supplementary files at online submission or  send your E-mail it to: faizrisd@gmail.com
Information to help prepare the Title Page
This should include the title, authors' names and affiliations, and a complete address for the corresponding author including telephone and e-mail address. The title of the paper should be written in Arial, 16pt, Bold, Justify, capitalize each word, and align left).

Information to help prepare the Blinded Manuscript
Besides the obvious need to remove names and affiliations under the title within the manuscript, there are other steps that need to be taken to ensure the manuscript is correctly prepared for double-blind peer review.  To assist with this process the key items that need to be observed are as follows:
  • Use the third person to refer to work the Authors have previously undertaken, e.g. replace any phrases like “as we have shown before” with “… has been shown before [Anonymous, 2007]” .
  • Make sure figures do not contain any affiliation related identifier
  • Do not eliminate essential self-references or other references but limit self-references only to papers that are relevant for those reviewing the submitted paper.
  • Cite papers published by the Author in the text as follows:  ‘[Anonymous, 2007]’.
  • For blinding in the reference list:  ‘[Anonymous 2007] Details omitted for double-blind reviewing.’
  • Remove references to funding sources
  • Do not include acknowledgments
  • Remove any identifying information, including author names, from file names and ensure document properties are also anonymized.
The paper will be published in REGISTER journal after peer-reviewed process and decided “Accepted” by Editor. The final paper layout will be reproduced by Editorial Office of REGISTER journal. The final paper layout in PDF type, known as “Uncorrected Proof” should be corrected by Author. The final corrected proof will be published first in “Article In Press” pre-issue.
According to Engelmore and Morgan [1], manuscript content should, in general, be organized in the following order: Title; Authors Name; Authors Affiliation; Abstract; Keywords; Introduction; Materials and Methods; Results and Discussion; Conclusions; Acknowledgments; and References. Manuscript document submitted to this journal (in one MS Word or PDF file) should be arranged as follow:
a)      Body text of manuscript article (from Title to References, without tables and figures)
b)      Figure Captions and Table Captions
c)      Figures (one figure per page)
d)     Tables (one table per page)

Section Headings
Three levels of heading are allowed as follows:
  • Level 1 (Heading1 format) - 12pt, Times bold, left justified
  • Level 2 (Heading2 format) - 12pt, Times bold, left justified
  • Level 3 (Heading3 format) - 12pt, Times bold italic, left justified
Body Text
The body of the text is a set of body text paragraphs defined as follows:
  • 12pt Times New Roman
  • One-half space, defined as 12pt
  • Spacing after the heading is 3pt
  • Spacing before the new heading is 12pt
  • Indentation for the first line is 1 cm.
Bullets
Bullet and numbering within body text are not allowed. All sentences should be typed as descriptive paragraph format.

Tables
Tables are sequentially numbered with the table title and number above the table. Tables should be centered in the column OR on the page. Tables should be followed by a line space (12pt). Elements of a table should be single-spaced, however double spacing can be used to show groupings of data or to separate parts within the table.  Table headings should be in 10pt bold. Tables are referred in the text by the table number. eg: Table 1. Do not show vertical line in the table. There is only horizontal line should be shown within the table.

Figures
Figures are sequentially numbered commencing at 1 with the figure title and number below the figure as shown in Figure 1. Detailed recommendations for figures are as follows:
  • Ensure that figures are clear and legible with typed letterings.
  • Black & white or colored figures are allowed.
  • If a figure spans two columns, it should be placed at the top or bottom of a page.
  • Hard copy illustrations should, preferably, be scanned and included in the electronic version of the submission in an appropriate format as follows:
-     BMP - Microsoft bitmap file
-     WMF - Windows Metafile Format
-     EPS - Encapsulated Postscript
  • If figures cannot be scanned, the original should be placed in its location within the manuscript using wax or colorless glue.
  • The following files are permissible:
-     Microsoft Graph
-     Microsoft Draw
Figure 1 shows an included Microsoft Draw object.

Results and Discussion
Manuscript Heading, Font, and Spacing ¬ 12pt, Times New Roman italics
Manuscript should be typed using word processors (Microsoft Word or Open Office) software. The font used throughout the paper is Times New Roman. The paper size is A4 (i.e., 210 x 297 mm), Lines are one-half spaced, justified. Page numbers should be included in the text located in footer section of each page.
Manuscript submitted to this journal should follow the heading below, except for the review article: Title; Authors Name; Authors Affiliation; Abstract; Keywords; Introduction; Methods; Results & Discussion; Conclusions; and References

Paper Title
This is your opportunity to attract the reader’s attention. Remember that readers are the potential authors who will cite your article. Identify the main issue of the paper. Begin with the subject of the paper. The title should be accurate, unambiguous, specific, and complete. Do not contain infrequently-used abbreviations.  The title of the paper should be in 12 pt bold Arial.
Authors Name and Affiliations
Write Author(s) names without title and professional positions such as Prof, Dr, Production Manager, etc. Do not abbreviate your last/family name. Always give your First and Last names. Write clear affiliation of all Authors. Affiliation includes: name of department/unit, (faculty), name of university, address, country.
Author names should be in 12 pt Arial bold.  Author affiliations should be in 12 pt  Arial.


 Abstract and Keywords
Abstract should stand alone, means that no citation in abstract. Consider it the advertisement of your article. Abstract should tell the prospective reader what you did and highlight the key findings. Avoid using technical jargon and uncommon abbreviations. The abstract should be in one paragraph. The font is Times New Roman, 12 pt, italic, and justify. Abstract is in 200-250 words, which is followed by 3-5 keywords. The abstract should succinctly describe your entire paper. It comprises of the purposes of the research, method, and the findings of the research. Keywords are the labels of your manuscript and critical to correct indexing and searching. Therefore, the keywords should represent the content and highlight of your article.Use only those abbreviations that are firmly established in the field. Each words/phrase in keyword should be separated by a semicolon (;), not a comma (,).
 Introduction
In Introduction, Authors should state the objectives of the work at the end of introduction section. Before the objective, Authors should provide an adequate background, and very short literature survey in order to record the existing solutions/method, to show which is the best of previous researches, to show the main limitation of the previous researches, to show what do you hope to achieve (to solve the limitation), and to show the scientific merit or novelties of the paper. Avoid a detailed literature survey or a summary of the results. Do not describe literature survey as author by author, but should be presented as group per method or topic reviewed which refers to some literatures.
This section discusses the purposes of the study or research problems, the contribution to knowledge, and research gap. Please state them clearly in the beginning paragraph supported by related theories in the next paragraphs. INTRODUCTION to CONCLUSION should be 4.000 – 5.250 words.
 
Methods
Materials and methods should make readers be able to reproduce the experiment. Provide sufficient detail to allow the work to be reproduced. Methods already published should be indicated by a reference: only relevant modifications should be described. Do not repeat the details of established methods.
This section explains the rationale for the application of specific approaches, methods, procedures or techniques used to identify, select, and analyze information applied to understand the research problem/project, thereby, allowing the readers to critically evaluate your project’s/study's overall validity and reliability.
Results and Discussion
Results should be clear and concise. The results should summarize (scientific) findings rather than providing data in great detail. Please highlight differences between your results or findings and the previous publications by other researchers. The discussion should explore the significance of the results of the work, not repeat them. A combined Results and Discussion section is often appropriate. Avoid extensive citations and discussion of published literature.
The discussion is written to interpret and describe the significance of your findings in light of what was already known about the issues being investigated, and to explain any new understanding or insights about the problem after you have taken the findings into consideration. It should connect to the introduction by way of the research questions or hypotheses you posed and the literature you reviewed, but it does not simply repeat or rearrange the introduction; this section should always explain how your study has moved the reader's understanding of the research problem forward from where you left them at the end of the introduction.
The research findings in the form of research data are further discussed or critically interpreted with particular relevant theoretical approach. Data can also be supported with the presentation of tables, images, etc. Captions for table is written above it with sequenced numbering so that it can be easily referred to, though not put under the pointing sentence/ paragraph. Line (border) to the table is made minimalist by eliminating the vertical lines and leaving horizontal lines deemed necessary. Captions for images are placed below the picture, also with providing sequenced numbering. One page only accommodates a table or an image with a maximum of two-thirds the size of the page (size adjusted as efficiently as possible).
 
 
 
 
In discussion, it is the most important section of your article. Here you get the chance to sell your data. Make the discussion corresponding to the results, but do not reiterate the results. Often should begin with a brief summary of the main scientific findings (not experimental results). The following components should be covered in discussion: How do your results relate to the original question or objectives outlined in the Introduction section (what)? Do you provide interpretation scientifically for each of your results or findings presented (why)? Are your results consistent with what other investigators have reported (what else)? Or are there any differences?
Conclusions
Conclusions should only answer the objectives of research. Tells how your work advances the field from the present state of knowledge. Without clear Conclusions, reviewers and readers will find it difficult to judge the work, and whether or not it merits publication in the journal. Do not repeat the Abstract, or just list experimental results. Provide a clear scientific justification for your work, and indicate possible applications and extensions. You should also suggest future experiments and/or point out those that are underway.
References
The conclusion is intended to answer the research problems or purposes. It helps the readers understand why your research should matter to them after they have finished reading the paper. It is not just a summary of the main topics covered or a re-statement of your research problem, but a synthesis of key points and, if applicable, where you recommend new areas for future research.
Cite the main scientific publications on which your work is based. Cite only items that you have read. Do not inflate the manuscript with too many references. Avoid excessive selfcitations. Avoid excessive citations of publications from the same region. Check each reference against the original source (authors name, volume, issue, year, DOI Number). Please use Reference Manager Applications like EndNote, Mendeley, Zotero, etc. Use other published articles in the same journal as models.
4. Guideline for Online Submission
Author should first register as Author and/or is offered as Reviewer through the following address: http://journalregister.iainsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/register/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions
Author should fulfill the form as detail as possible where the star marked form must be entered. After all form textbox was filled, Author clicks on “Register” button to proceed the registration. Therefore, Author is brought to online author submission interface where Author should click on “New Submission”. In the Start a New Submission section, click on “’Click Here’: to go to step one of the five-step submission process”.
The following are five steps in online submission process:
    Step 1 - Starting the Submission: Select the appropriate section of journal, i.e. Original Research Articles, Review Article, or Short Communication. Thus, author must check-mark on the submission checklists.
    Step 2 – Uploading the Submission: To upload a manuscript to this journal, click Browse on the Upload submission file item and choose the manuscript document file to be submitted, then click Upload button. Please make sure that the manuscript file has been uploaded. All manuscript sections paper should be uploaded in this step in a file. Do not upload graphical abstract here.
    Step 3 – Entering Submission’s Metadata: In this step, detail authors metadata should be entered including marked corresponding author. After that, manuscript title and abstract must be uploaded by copying the text and paste in the textbox including keywords.
    Step 4 – Uploading Supplementary Files: Supplementary file should be uploaded including Author Biodata, Covering/Submission Letter, and Signed  Statement of Originality. Therefore, click on Browse button, choose the files, and then click on Upload button.
    Step 5 – Confirming the Submission:  Author should final check the uploaded manuscript documents in this step. To submit the manuscript to REGISTER journal, click Finish Submission button after the documents is true. The corresponding author or the principal contact will receive an acknowledgement by email and will be able to view the submission’s progress through the editorial process by logging in to the journal web address site.
After this submission, Author who submits the manuscript will get a confirmation email about the submission. Therefore, Author is able to track his submission status at anytime by logging in to the online submission interface. The submission tracking includes status of manuscript review and editorial process.
Author Fee (No Page Charge)
REGISTER Journal is an open access international journal and authors should not pay some processing and submission fees for article processing (free of charge), except for conference collaboration. The readers can read and download any full-text articles for free of charge.
Conclusions
Papers not prepared in accordance with these guidelines and manuscripts with number of mistakes will have to be pre-rejected by Editor. Submission of full text paper can be conducted by Online Electronic Submissions Interface at the following URL address:
REFERENCES  ← 12pt, Times bold   (should use APA 6th referencing style.(Examples are available on: Example of APA 6th Edition)(References Should be Typed in Alphabetical Order, Times New Roman Font size of heading 12, 1,5 spaced and the minimum requirement is 20 references and it is suggested to use reference software like Mendeley or Zotero)
Gore, A. (2006). An inconvenient truth: The planetary emergency of global warming and what we can do about it. Emmaus, PA: Rodale.
Michaels, P. J., & Balling, R. C., Jr. (2000).The satanic gases: Clearing the air about global warming. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
New York State Department of Health. (2002). After a sexual assault. [Brochure]. Albany, NY:  Author.
Environmental resource handbook. (2001). Millerton, NY: Grey House.
Greenhouse effect.(2005). American heritage science dictionary. Boston, MA: Houghton   Mifflin.
 Schneider, S. H. (2000). Greenhouse effect.World book encyclopedia (Millennium ed.  Vol. 8, pp. 382-383). Chicago, IL: World Book.
Begley, S., &Murr, A. (2007, July 2). Which of these is not causing global warming? A. Sport utility vehicles; B. Rice fields; C. Increased solar output. Newsweek, 150(2), 48-50.
College officials agree to cut greenhouse gases. (2007, June 13). Albany Times Union, p. A4.
 Landler, M. (2007, June 2). Bush’s Greenhouse Gas Plan Throws Europe Off Guard.  New York Times, p. A7.
 Miller-Rushing, A. J., Primack, R. B., Primack, D., &Mukunda, S. (2006). Photographs and herbarium specimens as tools to document phonological changes in response   to global warming.American Journal of Botany, 93, 1667-1674.
Bogdonoff, S., & Rubin, J. (2007). The regional greenhouse gas initiative: Taking action in  Maine. Environment, 49(2), 9-16.
Mora, C., & Maya, M. F. (2006).Effect of the rate of temperature increase of the dynamic method on the heat tolerance of fishes.Journal of Thermal Biology, 31, 337-341.  doi: 10.101b/jtherbio.2006.01.055
  United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2007, May 4). Climate Change.Retrieved From the Environmental Protection Agency website: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange
Gelspan, R. (2007). The Heat Is Online. Lake Oswego, OR: Green House Network. Retrieved fromThe Heat Is Online website: http://www.heatisonline.org/

 

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

  1. The article must be scientific, either based on the empirical research or conceptual ideas. The content of the article have not published yet in any journal, and should not be submitted simultaneously to another journal. Article should not be part of fully one chapter of the theses or dissertation.
  2. Article must be in the range between  4.750 – 5.250 words (17-18 pages), not including title, abstract, keywords, and bibliography
    1. Article consisting of the various parts: i.e. title, the author’s name(s) and affiliation(s), abstract (200-250 words), Keywords (maximum 3 words), introduction, description and analysis, conclusion, and bibliography.
    • Title should not be more than 15 words 
    • Author’s name(s) should be written in the full name without academic title (degree), and completed with institutional affiliation(s) as well as corresponding address (e-mail address). 
    • Abstract consists of the discourses of the discipline area; the aims of article; methodology (if any); research finding; and contribution to the discipline of areas study. Abstract should be written in English. 
    • Introduction consists of the literature review (would be better if the research finding is not latest than ten years) and novelty of the article; scope and limitation of the problem discussed; and the main argumentation of the article. 
    • Discussion or description and analysis consist of reasoning process of the article’s main argumentation. 
    • Conclusion should be consisting of answering research problem, based on the theoretical significance/conceptual construction 
    • All of the bibliography used should be written properly
  3. Citation’s style used is the APA (American Psychological Association) style 6th Edition. Examples are available on: Example of APA 6th Edition :
  4. In writing the citation’s would be better and suggested to use software of citation manager, like Mendeley, Zotero, End-Note, Ref-Works, Bib-Text, and so forth, with following standard of APA Style 6th Edition.
  5. Article must be free from plagiarism; through attached evidence (screenshot) that article has been verified through anti-plagiarism software, but not limited to the plagiarism checker (plagramme.com).
 

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

 

Author Fees

This journal charges the following author fees.

Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR)
Authors are required to pay an Article Submission Fee as part of the submission process to contribute to review costs.

Fast-Track Review: 0.00 (IDR)
With the payment of this fee, the review, editorial decision, and author notification on this manuscript is guaranteed to take place within 4 weeks.

Article Publication: 0.00 (IDR)
This Open Access journal does not charge any processing or publishing fees for every article published.

If you do not have funds to pay such fees, you will have an opportunity to waive each fee. We do not want fees to prevent the publication of worthy work.